Possibly the most famous trial in
Walsall’s history is that of the Walsall anarchists in 1892.
It involved a revolutionary organisation, a secret bomb
factory, and police informers.
It all began in the summer of 1891 when
four foreigners arrived in the town from London, looking for
work. They were Victor Cailes, his partner Marie Piberne,
Frederick Charles, and George Laplace. Victor and Marie
found lodgings at 54 Green Lane, while Frederick and George
moved into 272 Green Lane, the house and workshop of William
Ditchfield. Another person involved in the plot was Joseph
Deakin, a railway clerk who lived above a draper’s shop at
238 Stafford Street. He was one of the founders of the
Walsall Socialist Club, a branch of the Social Democratic
Federation whose members were extreme socialists, greatly
influenced by the writings of Karl Marx. The club was based
in a rented house at 18 Goodall Street which had been
procured by one of the members, John Wesley, who had a
brush making business next door at number 17.
This was a time of political unrest,
most prominently demonstrated by the Irish Nationalists who
had been planting bombs in England. Bombs were also planted
by other revolutionary groups known as anarchists, who at an
international conference in 1881 at Brussels announced their
intention to use the dagger, the gun, bombs, and dynamite to
promote their cause.
Local police forces were quite rightly
interested in the activities of such groups and kept a close
eye on them. Walsall’s Chief Constable, Christopher Taylor
had been keeping a close watch on the activities of the
Socialist Club and became concerned about the presence of
the four foreigners. At the time many European immigrants
were political refugees who brought their political beliefs
with them, and so their presence in Walsall set alarm bells
ringing.
The police had informers within the
anarchist movement and so the Chief Constable turned to them
in an attempt to discover what was going on. Aguste Coulon,
a London-based anarchist and police informer mentioned that
bombs were being manufactured in Walsall, which led to a
visit by Inspector Melville from London. He informed the
Chief Constable that Jean Battolla, a flamboyant Italian was
about to visit the town, and so the police kept a lookout
for him. Two police officers Taylor and Melville were on
duty when Battolla arrived at Walsall railway station. They
followed him to the Socialist Club, and then followed him
when he left to go to William Ditchfield’s house in Green
Lane with Victor Cailes and Marie Piberne. They then
followed the group back to the Socialist Club and continued
their vigil until their watch ended at 8 p.m.
By this time they had observed Joseph
Deakin, Frederick Charles, and John Wesley going in and out
of the club several times. Afterwards Sergeant Cliffe took
over the police watch until Taylor and Melville returned the
following morning. Battolla stayed the night in Walsall, and
his activities, and those of the club members were noted. In
the afternoon they followed Battolla, Wesley, and Charles to
the railway station where Battolla caught the five twenty
train to London.
On 6th January, 1892 Joseph Deakin went
to London, where he was arrested for refusing to explain why
he was in possession of a bottle of chloroform. Battolla was
also arrested.
Back in Walsall the police jumped into
action. On 7th January, Christopher Taylor and Sergeant
Cliffe questioned William Ditchfield at his house in Green
Lane and removed a plaster mould, and lead and brass bolts.
They took Ditchfield into custody for further questioning.
They then visited the Socialist Club and arrested Charles,
Cailes, and Marie Piberne. They took away more moulds, a
length of fuse, a mixture of plaster and horsehair, and some
anarchist literature. At the time John Wesley was away, but
he was arrested on his return to the railway station.
Deakin and Battolla were brought from
London, and the whole group was held in the cells beneath
the Magistrates Court. Marie Piberne was quickly released,
but the others continued to be held until they could appear
before the local magistrates, which they did on 21st
January.
During the proceedings the Chief
Constable stated that when Charles was arrested he was in
possession of a loaded revolver, ammunition, and a
sketch of a bomb. He also said that on the night of 15th
January he had been given a statement written by Deakin
stating that the chloroform had been taken to London at the
request of Frederick Charles. The Chief Constable also
stated that Deakin was later interviewed by Inspector
Melville. During the interview Deakin stated that Charles
was a police spy. He then supplied Deakin with paper to
write a second statement. In the statement he stated that he
and his comrades had been making bombs, and that the idea
had originated in a letter to Charles from someone at the
anarchist club in London. He believed the bombs were to be
used in Russia against the tyrannous regime of the Czar.
Colonal Ford, a Home Office explosive
expert gave evidence about the moulds. He stated that they
could be used to produce the casing for a bomb if they were
slightly adjusted during moulding, but admitted that he
would not have thought them to be suspicious if it hadn’t
been suggested beforehand. He also said that the fuse was
not suspicious, being just ordinary miner’s fuse.
Evidence was given to show that on 23rd
November, 1891 the moulds had been sent to Mr. Bullows, an
ironfounder in Long Street to ask for a quotation for some
castings. He unsuccessfully tried to produce samples, but
there were problems with the mould. The police later asked
him to try again, and this time he was successful after
slightly altering the mould. It hadn’t occurred to him that
the castings might be for bombs.
Several other experts gave evidence,
and all six men were committed for trial at Stafford
Assizes.
The trial took place on 30th March,
1892 before Mr. Justice Hawkins, and the Attorney General,
Sir Richard Webster, Q.C. in the Crown Court Room at
Stafford Shire Hall. The defendants were charged with two
offences under the 1883 Explosive Substances Act:
1. That between 1st November,
1891, and 7th January, 1892 at the Borough of Walsall, with
being in possession of explosive substances for unlawful
purpose.
2. That between 1st November,
1891, and 7th January, 1892 they unlawfully conspired
together to cause by explosive substances, an explosion in
the United Kingdom.
The evidence was much the same as had
already been given at Walsall. None of the defendants gave
evidence. After a short trial Charles, Cailes, and Battola
were sentenced to ten years penal servitude, and Deakin to
five. Ditchfield and Wesley were acquitted.
After the convictions many socialist
campaigners believed the whole thing was a police plot. A
London journalist called Nicholls was imprisoned for making
speeches, and publishing pamphlets in which he stated that
the men were framed by police spies, notably Aguste Coulon.
After the trial Walsall Council
presented Chief Constable, Christopher Taylor with fifty
pounds for his efforts in the case. It had been rumoured
that the Czar of Russia presented him with a diamond tiepin.
It is not known what happened to Wesley, Ditchfield, Cailes,
and Battolla, but Joe Deakin returned to Walsall and
continued his socialist work. Frederick Charles married
twice, and became involved in socialist agricultural
experiments. He died in Oxfordshire in 1934.
The episode leaves a lot of unanswered
questions. Were the castings really for bombs? If so where
were they to be used? Did the police simply over react?
The
Walsall Anarchists (1892)
From
the Walsall Free Press and South
Staffordshire Advertiser. April 1892.
In January, 1892, five
men who lived in Walsall and one who lived
in London, were arrested on charges of being
in possession of explosive substances for an
unlawful purpose and conspiring to cause an
explosion in the United Kingdom of a nature
likely to endanger life or to cause serious
injury to property, under the Explosives Act
of 1883.
The prisoners were:
Frederick
Charles |
(27) |
57 Long Street,
Walsall |
Commercial Clerk |
Victor Cailes
(French ) |
(33) |
18 Goodall
Street, Walsall |
Railway man |
John Wesley |
(32) |
17 Goodall
Street, Walsall |
Brush Maker |
William
Ditchfield |
(40) |
272 Green Lane,
Walsall |
Hand Filer |
Joseph Thomas
Deakin |
|
238 Stafford
Street, Walsall |
Railway Clerk |
Jean Battolla
(Italian) |
|
Charlotte
Street, Soho, London |
|
Joseph Deakin was one
of the founder members of the Walsall
Socialist Club which met at 18 Goodall
Street, Walsall. He had represented the
United Kingdom at an International
Anarchists Conference in Brussels where he
had met Cailes, Battolla and Aguste Coulon,
member of the Autonomie Club group of
Anarchists. Cailes was wanted by the French
police and he came to Walsall where Deakin
helped to find him a job.
The case was first
brought before the Walsall magistrates and
the prisoners all complained about their
treatment, accommodation and food. 'The
Chief Constable admitted that the prisoners
were only given enough food to keep them
alive'.
It later emerged that
one of the prisoners had been woken up and
cross examined in the middle of the night
and been offered whisky and cigars as an
inducement to make a statement. However, a
subsequent enquiry by the Walsall Watch
Committee as to the treatment of the
prisoners whilst in custody at Walsall,
exonerated the Chief Constable Christopher
Taylor, and as subsequent documents
illustrate he was rewarded by the Treasury
for his efforts.
On February 16th, 1892,
the case was transferred to Stafford
Assizes, although the trial did not begin
until March 30th. The case came before Mr.
Justice Hawkins and the Attorney General
(Sir Richard Webster, Q.C.) who led the
prosecution for the Crown. The prisoners all
pleaded not guilty and it does appear from
the evidence that Aguste Coulon, an
anarchist based in London had acted as an
agent provocateur for the police. However,
evidence was also given at an attempt to
manufacture explosive devices, although this
was unsuccessful. A number of Anarchist
pamphlets, found at 18 Goodall Street, were
also read out in the court, which appeared
to threaten a bombing campaign. The
prisoners claimed that most of this
literature had been planted by the police.
In April 1892, the jury
found Charles, Cailes, Battolla and Deakin
guilty. Wesley and Ditchfield were
discharged. The Judge sentenced Charles,
Cailes, and Battolla to ten years penal
servitude and Deakin to five years penal
servitude.
Many socialist and
labour clubs throughout the country
campaigned against the sentence, believing
the whole thing to be a police plot. |
|
|