The Medieval Town
Little is known about the town, other than what is
recorded in the Domesday Book, until 1164 when King
Henry II exchanged it for the manor of Stonesfield. At
the time, the King had a large manor at Woodstock in
Oxfordshire, with extensive land on which he built a
pleasure ground for his mistress Rosamond de Clifford.
He needed the land at Stonesfield, which belonged to the
barony of d’Oyley for part of the manor grounds. After
the exchange Wednesbury came under the control of
d’Oyley’s tenant Ralph Boterel, who became lord of the
manor.
Payments made to the Crown were
recorded in the Exchequer Records, known as the Pipe
Rolls. Wednesbury had a taxable value of £4 a year,
whereas Stonesfield was only worth £3 a year. To balance
matters an agreement was reached in which Boterel would
still owe service as a Knight to the barony and also pay
an annual rent of one pound to the crown. Boterel died
in 1181 and the records show that he had never paid his
rent. When William de Heronville took over the manor in
1182 he was charged with 18 years arrears, which he
immediately agreed to pay. William became lord of the
manor after marrying Boterel’s daughter and heiress.
William rented the mill to the
monks of Bordesley Abbey for 10 shillings a year. By
1225 William had passed away, and in January 1226 his
son, also named William became lord of the manor.
William conveyed the mill to the monks of Bordesley
Abbey, who in turn sublet it to the Hillary family,
lords of the manor of Bescot, for a free farm rent,
which was usually set at one third of the taxable value
of the property. This meant that the Hillary’s paid rent
and took the profits from the compulsory payments that
were made by the local population for their use of the
mill.
John
de Heronville
In about 1255 William was succeeded
by Simon de Heronville, who died in 1259. His son and
heir, John succeeded him, but had not yet come of age.
As a result he became the ward of the Earl and Countess
of Warwick, who had taken over the barony of d’Oyley by
marriage. He came of age around 1261, and his son and
heir, Henry was born in 1265. John married twice. His
first wife was the sister and one of the heirs of
William Fitzwarren of Tipton and as a result he gained a
share in the manor of Tipton. He later married Juliana,
who outlived him.
John took up his knighthood in 1272
because it was the king’s policy that all lords of the
manor should do so. The two lions on his shield
eventually formed the basis of the borough’s coat of
arms. He became one of most prominent knights in the
county and along with three others chose the members of
the county jury, becoming a juror himself on more than
one occasion.
John became one of the four
Verderers of Cannock Forest. They were the officials who
were elected by the freeholders to administer the laws
regarding the forest. The Verderers’ Court would meet to
settle disputes etc. In those days the forest extended
from Cannock into Wednesbury, and covered about a half
of the manor. John also paid fines for some of his
tenants when they illegally felled trees or converted
woodland into farmland.
F.W. Hackwood in his “Wednesbury
Ancient and Modern” suggests that the forest ended along
the line of the present High Street, to Oakeswell End,
then along Hydes Road to the Tame, following the river
along the Bescot boundary.
Many towns such as Wednesbury held
manorial courts called Court Leets. They date back to
Saxon times and survived the Norman conquest without any
great change taking place. John had the right to hold
such a court in which the officers were the Steward, the
Reeve (who acted as an intermediary between tenants and
lord of the manor), the Constable, the Haywards (who
supervised and maintained the boundaries) and the Jury
men. The Steward had a very important role; he
supervised the estate, organised its economy and
maintained justice. A full account of all that happened
during each year in the manor had to be submitted to the
lord of the manor in an annual statement called the
Account Roll.
The principal functions of the
court were the preservation of the rights of the lord of
the manor and the regulation of relations between
tenants. It dealt with breaches of the peace, criminal
affairs and ensured that the tenants carried out their
statutory obligations. The court also upheld the “assize
of bread and ale” by appointing ale tasters to ensure
that standards were maintained.
What remained of the manor house
in 1892. From an old postcard.
John was clearly forthright in his
views and would vigorously defend his rights against
anyone who challenged them. In 1272 he was sued by 20 of
his tenants in the Court of King’s Bench. Although
disputes would usually be settled in the Court Leet, the
tenants of Wednesbury collectively brought an action
against their lord in the hope that the royal court
would change the rules within the manor. They felt that
they were unfairly treated by John who demanded extra
customs and services from them than were rendered when
the manor was in the hands of the King. The case would
continue for many years with several suits being taken
against him. John simply ignored the rulings made by the
court, who ordered him to return the goods and chattels
that he had seized from the tenants. In 1280 he was in
contempt of the court and prosecuted by the crown. The
quarrel went on for thirty years, during which time
relations between the lord and tenants must have become
strained to say the least. Unfortunately the court’s
final decision on the matter is not known.
John was also involved in a number
of other disputes. In 1280 he was accused, along with
two of his tenants, of dispossessing Henry de Bruly of
property in Wednesbury. The case was thrown out because
Henry’s writ had no validity at the assizes, and should
have been considered at the manorial court. In another
case at the assizes in 1293, William de Darlaston
claimed that he had been dispossessed of his right of
common in Wednesbury. This time the court tried the
claim, but it was rejected because Wednesbury was an
ancient manor, and Darlaston, where the building to
which the alleged right of common existed, was not.
|
The area occupied by the old town. |
In 1286 Thomas Hillary took John to
court because John and his tenants had not been paying
taxes owed to him for use of the mill, which he had
previously sublet from Bordesley Abbey. As a result John
agreed that he and his tenants would pay the sum owed
and the claim for damages was dropped.
It is possible that this came about
because it was compulsory to use the manor’s mill, and
the tenants were trying to avoid payment by using hand
mills of their own.
John de Heronville died in 1315 and
the manor came under the control of the son by his first
wife, Henry. John’s widow Juliana was entitled to one
third of the estate for life (her dower) or until she
remarried. The document relating to the dower is an
important record, giving details of much of the estate.
It records several coal pits, and as such is the
earliest record of coal working in the town. Similarly
it contains the earliest record of ironstone mining in
the town. There are however, earlier records of coal
mining at Sedgley and Walsall.
|
It seems that the 14th
century pits in Wednesbury were near Bradeswell,
possibly referring to Broad Waters. In some areas the 10
yard coal seam outcrops at, or very near the surface and
this is where the first coal would probably have been
extracted. In the 15th century Cockheath was
named as a coal mining area.
Juliana's share of the manor house included a hall,
pantry, a solar (a private room on the sunny side of the
house), a cellar beneath the solar, a brewhouse, a
bakery, stables, a cow house, and a long sheep house.
The buildings were arranged around a courtyard with the
hall and kitchen on opposite sides, and the solar and
bakery on the other sides. There was a well in the
centre, a gate house, an outer court, a garden and 2
yards. She also had her share of the dovecote, and 145
strips of arable land, part of John’s 120 acres. It
appears that these strips were interspersed with strips
belonging to the tenants in the common fields. The
document contains some of the field names, the first
time they were recorded. They are Monway Field, Church
Field, Hall Field, and Kings Hill Field.
Henry's share of the estate
included the manor house with courtyards and gardens,
120 acres of arable land, 10 acres of meadow (the common
land of the village), and a dwelling house formerly
belonging to Thomas Trond, with 15 acres of arable land,
including 2 acres of meadow. Henry was 50 at the time,
but only survived for another year, dying in 1316. His
son John Heronville II, aged 12 then inherited the
estate.
The taxes paid to the crown by the
nobility, clergy and laity were listed in the Subsidy
Rolls. The record for the year 1327 reveals that
Juliana, John’s widow, paid the highest tax in the town,
4shillings and 4¼pence, John Heronville II being absent
from the list. In 1332-3 Juliana paid 6shillings and
4¾pence and John paid 3shillings and 8¾pence.
The
Subsidy Rolls
The Subsidy Rolls of 1332 to 1333
include the names of individuals assessed for tax. Only
the richer members of society were eligible to pay the
tax, and although the list cannot be used to calculate
population figures, it does provide an indication of the
comparative size and prosperity of Wednesbury and the
surrounding towns. The amount of tax paid was based upon
the value of movable goods that were owned by each
person and the status of the town. People living in
cities, boroughs and ancient manors paid one tenth of
the value, whereas others paid one fifteenth of the
value. People whose movable goods were valued at less
than 10 shillings were exempt.
Subsidy Rolls
- 1332 to 1333
|
Town |
fraction of
value paid |
Number of taxpayers |
Amount paid |
Total value
of goods |
Bilston |
1/15th |
11 |
£1.3s.0d. |
£17.5s.0d. |
Birmingham |
1/15th |
69 |
£9.1s.4d. |
£136.0s.0d. |
Darlaston and Bentley |
1/15th |
12 |
£0.17s.0d. |
£12.15s.0d. |
Tipton |
1/15th |
9 |
£1.14s.8d. |
£26.0s.0d. |
Walsall |
1/10th |
25 |
£3.16s.0d. |
£38.0s.0d. |
Wednesbury |
1/10th |
13 |
£1.19s.1d. |
£19.10s.10d. |
Wednesfield |
1/15th |
14 |
£1.10s.0d. |
£22.10s.0d. |
West Bromwich |
1/15th |
11 |
£1.12s.0d. |
£24.0s.0d. |
Willenhall |
1/15th |
16 |
£1.13s.0d. |
£24.15s.0d. |
Wolverhampton |
1/15th |
30 |
£3.0s.8d. |
£45.10s.0d. |
14th
Century Court Proceedings
It seems that the relationship
between the Heronvilles, their tenants and the Hillary’s
of Bescot was becoming somewhat strained. In 1316 Thomas
Hillary sued 21 tenants from the manor of Wednesbury for
non payment of their dues for the mill, and claimed £100
in damages. The case was heard in the King’s court by
Sir Roger Hillary, lord of Bescot, and Chief Justice of
the Court of Common Pleas. The tenants admitted their
liability and the court decided that Roger was to
recover the money owed and collect 6shillings and 8pence
damages from each tenant. Roger Hillary then brought a
second case against 6 of his own tenants who had not
paid their taxes to the mill for 2 years, and claimed
£40 in damages. Once again the tenants admitted
liability and Roger recovered what was owed, and
collected 6shillings and 8pence damages from each
tenant. The mill remained as a corn mill until 1423 when
it became a fulling mill.
The Plea Rolls of 1337 offer
evidence to suggest that coal was extensively mined in
the area at the time. The document records that John
Walters of Wednesbury sued Sir Roger Hillary for taking
away "by force and arms" sea coal or "carbones
maritimos" to the value of £40 from his mines at
Wednesbury. In 1393 John Wylkys sued Roger Norton of
Darlaston for "digging and carrying away sea coal from
his several soil" at Wednesbury to the value of £10.
In 1344 at the manorial court in
Wednesbury, John de Alne was accused of being a common
robber after a break-in at John de Heronville's cellar,
at night, when items worth 17 shillings and 2 pence were
stolen. He was sent to Stafford to be detained until he
could be tried before the next gaol delivery. After
waiting 4 years, his trial took place before Roger
Hillary, who subsequently became Lord Chief Justice of
England. John de Alne was eventually sentenced to be
hanged.
The
Black Death
The late 1340s were terrible times
because of the onset of the Black Death, or plague as it
was known. It began in the wet summer of 1348 and large
numbers of people were rapidly dying. It continued
throughout the winter and became even more virulent in
the early months of 1349, continuing into 1350. It began
to return regularly, first in 1361 and again in the
1370s and 1380s. Large numbers of people died, greatly
affecting the working classes, possibly only ten percent
of whom survived. This would change the relationship
between the lord and his tenants and bring about an
early end to feudalism, in which the peasants had to
offer service with many obligations to their lord, in
return for a grant of land.
Peasants were now in short supply
and many farming communities disappeared. They now
wanted to dictate their own wage levels and terms of
employment. The rulers of the kingdom reacted strongly,
and within a year of the onset of plague, an Ordinance
of Labourers was issued, which became the Statute of
Labourers in 1351. This law attempted to prevent
peasants from obtaining higher wages, by ordering them
to accept wages at pre-plague levels. In reality the
high death rate meant that rents dwindled and much land
was uncultivated. Many villages were deserted and land
incomes fell. The rulers’ attempt to maintain the feudal
system failed, and before the end of the century the
working classes began to dictate their own terms and
freely move from one area to another, changing society
forever.
John
de Heronville III
John de Heronville II died in 1354
and was replaced by his son John, who married Alice, the
daughter of John of Tynmore. He bequeathed the manor of
Tynmore upon himself, his wife and their heirs, so
ensuring that the estate stayed in his family’s control.
At the time this action was illegal when carried out by
a tenant chief of the king, such as himself. As a result
he was ordered to pay a fine of 50 shillings to the
crown, which was equal to one third of the annual value
of the estate.
In 1366 John was sued by Sir Hugh
de Wrottesley for forcibly abducting one of his female
serfs. Seven years later John sued William Sagowe, a
chaplain, and Roger Hillary for abducting 4 men in his
service at Wednesbury. Both cases were possibly due to
the labour shortages following the Black Death. The
changes in the relationship between lord and tenant
possibly led John into a number of disputes with his
tenants, some of which ended up in the Royal Court.
|
Some of the local disputes involved
coal mining. In 1377 John Waters of Wednesbury sued
Roger Hillary of Bescot for taking coal to the value of
£40 from his mines at Wednesbury and in 1392 John Wylkys
sued Roger Norton of Darlaston for removing coal worth
£10 from his land. In 1403 John de Heronville’s second
son Henry took three tenants to court under the charge
that they trod down and consumed his corn and grass with
their cattle, and carried away earth to the value of
£10, which presumably refers to coal.
John de Heronville III died in 1406
and was survived by his three daughters, Joan aged 4,
Alice aged 2, and Margaret aged 12 months. They were
heirs to his estates at Wednesbury, Tynmore, and one
fifth of Tipton. As they were under age a guardian would
be appointed to look after them and also be custodian of
the manor. The guardian would be a close friend who was
not an eligible heir to the estate. John Ede in his
“History of Wednesbury” suggests that the first guardian
was John Brown of Lichfield, who was not very popular in
Wednesbury because in 1413 he had 4 men arrested for his
attempted murder. By 1415 John de Leventhorp became
guardian and it seems that he was also unpopular in the
town because Robert Nightingale, a coalminer, one of the
4 men already mentioned, attempted to murder him. He
also had problems with some of the tenants at Tynmore.
John de Leventhorp also seems to
have had problems with his tenants at Wednesbury due to
the changing relationship between tenant and lord as the
feudal system degenerated. In 1416 he obtained bonds for
£40 as security from coal miners Henry Hancocks and John
in the Lee, on the understanding that they would not dig
coal anywhere in the manor without his permission. In
spite of this measure they continued to dig coal much as
before and so later that year they were sued for a debt
of £40. During John’s time, relations between lord and
tenant reached an all time low and riots broke out. The
riots were probably about coal because John attempted to
protect his right to mine coal on his own land and also
to obtain a royalty from any tenant who mined it
elsewhere.
John de Leventhorp intended to keep
the manor of Wednesbury in his hands and this he did by
marrying Joan de Heronville to his eldest son William.
In 1418 he then persuaded the two younger sisters to
take the veil as nuns of the Order of Sempringham. As
nuns their share of the estate would pass to Joan, so
ensuring that William de Leventhorp became lord of the
manor of Wednesbury.
William and Joan had a daughter,
Elizabeth, and around 1435 William created a trust on
his land in Wednesbury, Fynchespath, Darlaston, and
Tipton so that if Joan outlived him she would be
entitled to the property for life, or until she
remarried. It would then pass on to their daughter
Elizabeth and her heirs.
Part of a map showing coal mines
in 1812.
Sir
Henry Beaumont
Some time before 1446 William had
died, and Joan married her second husband Sir Henry
Beaumont, who became lord of the manor.
Sir Henry Beaumont, lord of the
Yorkshire manor of Thorpe in Balme and second son of
Henry, the 5th Baron Beaumont came from a
distinguished family. His grandfather was a Knight of
the Garter, an admiral of the king’s fleet, and Warden
of the Scottish Marches and the Cinque Ports. His elder
brother was Constable and Great Chamberlain of England,
Knight of the Garter, and the first English Viscount.
Henry made a settlement of the
manor of Wednesbury (a complex arrangement for passing
on property) for his wife, himself and their heirs.
Henry and Joan had a son, also called Henry in 1446.
Unfortunately Henry senior died in the following year.
In 1452 Henry’s widow Joan resettled the manor upon
trustees, one of whom was Charles Nowell from Ellenhall
in Staffordshire. Charles became Joan’s 3rd
and last husband, and lord of the manor of Wednesbury.
Joan died some time after 1460, and her son Henry
Beaumont II became lord of the manor. Henry married
Eleanor, daughter of John, Lord Dudley and they had 1
daughter and 2 sons, the eldest, John, being born in
1470.
Henry’s reign ended on 16th
November, 1471, when he died. During his last year he
served as High Sheriff of Staffordshire. Before his
death he made a will leaving his land at Egington in
Derbyshire to his wife, and the remainder of his estate
to their son John. The will also expressed his wish that
his body should be buried in Wednesbury Church and that
a chaplain should celebrate mass for him for 3 years
after his death. He accordingly left 100 shillings to
the church, presumably to pay for the chaplain’s
services.
Eleanor’s son John married the
daughter of John Mitton of Weston in Staffordshire. They
had 3 children, Joan, Dorothy, and Eleanor. After his
death in 1502 the ownership of the manor passed onto his
3 daughters. Joan and Eleanor married two brothers,
William and Humphrey Babington, and Dorothy married
Humphrey Comberford, from Comberford near Tamworth. The
Beaumont estates were divided between the three sisters
as specified in their father’s will. Dorothy and her
husband Humphrey inherited Wednesbury, and their son
Thomas became lord of the manor. He also had estates at
Wigginton and Comberford. Most of
the old Wednesbury street and place names have
disappeared. The only street name that survives from
those olden times is the "Portway" or Portway Road. Some
place names from the old residential parts of the town
are still in use. They are Town End, Oakeswell End, Hall
End, and Bridge End. Near Bridge End is Finchpath and
the Ridding, another two of the old names. The High
Bullen was known as Hancock's Cross, possibly named
after the wealthy Hancock family.
The second most important residence after the manor
house was Oakeswell Hall named after a well, the Oakes
Well. William Byng built a house on the site around 1421
which descended into the Jennyns family. The adjacent
land, purchased by Thomas Hopkins and his wife was
called New Hall Fields. By 1662 the house became known
as Okeswell or Hopkins New Hall Place. In 1707 Richard
Parkes, ironmaster and Quaker purchased the house and
moved there in 1708. By 1774 it had become a farmhouse
and was occupied by the Kendrick family, and remained as
such until the 1820s. In 1825 the
house was owned by John Beaumont, a lawyer, and in 1846
it belonged to Walter Horton. It became known as "The
Rookery" and was later purchased by Wednesbury's first
Town Clerk, Joseph Smith, who greatly restored the
property. The house then came into the hands of Dr. G.
E. V. Morris and survived until 1962.
Oakeswell Hall. |
|
|
|
|
|
Return to
Beginnings |
|
Return to
the contents |
|
Proceed to the 16th Century |
|